A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and two months with prison labor for the crime of confinement, etc. in the support of the Sugwon method and Ansan, and on May 24, 2017, the Defendant completed the execution of the said sentence at a military prison.

1. Violation of the Child Uniforms Act (the coercion, intermediary, sexual harassment, etc. against a child) committed a violation of the Child Uniforms Act to C Park in Ansan-si on September 23, 2017. The victim D (the victim, the child, the child, the age of 13) was on board the Defendant’s urbane, and was hick around the said park.

The defendant et al., while moving the victim to the Oralba as above, set off the Oralba on the alleys side of the above underground roadway near the above park, and then "I am son and son" of the victim.

I. Doz. Doz.

I, above, Doz.

Oral flusium fluent

40 50 00 00

10 10 10 102

“The spoppy of the body of the victim” and “the spoppy of the chest.”

“.....”

As a result, the Defendant committed sexual abuse such as sexual harassment that causes a sense of sexual humiliation to children.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (voluntary indecent act) was aboard the said D at the time, place, and place indicated in paragraph 1, and went back to the said park and returned D again to the said park after the wheels was loaded near the said park. The Defendant was seated in the victim E (the family name, the female, and the age of 13) who is a child and juvenile of D’s pro-friendly child and juvenile, at the lower court.

That is, the Defendant is the above victim’s “Isle.”

지지이.

will be affixed with a photograph.

The defendant's cell phone camera taken the victim's cell phone, and the victim got out of the above Orala and the above D, and the defendant heard from D that the defendant committed the act as described in the above paragraph 1, which led to the omission of the part of the victim, and the defendant made a request to erase the victim's photograph.

However, the defendant refused to do so, and the victim is the defendant.