Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in driving service of BCA1105 which he/she owns.

At around 16:40 on December 10, 2019, the Defendant driven a distance of about 2 km from the trade influoral cafeteria located in the front west-gun of North Korea to the original intersection in the vicinity of the same military as the place of accident, without obtaining a bicycle bicycle license for a motor device, to 0.098% alcohol level.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Fact-finding survey report and evidence and photographs of the scene of a traffic accident;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses;

1. An inquiry into the enemy (B);

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Investigation report (report on the circumstances of an immigration driver);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts of crime, Articles 148-2 (3) 2, 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), subparagraph 2 of Article 154 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without a license) and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [aggravating concurrent crimes within the extent that the punishment is added to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act due to heavy drinking driving, and the long-term punishment for both crimes];

1. The sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is based on the following reasons: (a) the reason for the sentencing of Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act; (b) the occurrence of an accident, which was caused by the loss of balance between the driving distance and the intersection; (c) the Defendant purchased and continued to operate the otobbb on September 14, 2017; (d) the Defendant scrapped the obba, scrapped the oba; and (e) the fact that the oba does not have any