Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a CF car as a duty.

On February 9, 2014, around 06:15, the Defendant was driving a skin vehicle on the road in front of the Jeju Food Station located in the Gampoon-si, Gyeonggi Kimpo-si, Yangpo-si, and led to the accident point in the middle of the two-lanes from the long-term dong to the Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju High-do.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to observe the signal and drive safely.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of driving in violation of signal, D was driven in accordance with the new subparagraph on the right side of the driving direction by negligence, and received the front part of the Erati vehicle from the front side of the vehicle.

The Defendant damaged the property equivalent to KRW 4.889.438, such as the exchange of the latter part of the ERati vehicle quantity owned by D due to such occupational negligence, and immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant or D;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. A motor vehicle inspection and estimate for maintenance;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not know about the accident under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted by this Court, namely, that the Defendant was shocking the victim’s vehicle while the Defendant was in violation of the signal, and the Defendant looked at the Defendant vehicle after the said accident, and the damaged vehicle at the location near the vehicle at that time.