logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.02 2016고단2692
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal offenders are pro-friendly.

On May 5, 2016, at around 03:50, the Defendants were walking with one female at the center line of the road in front of the Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, with which their names cannot be known under the influence of alcohol. On the ground that G slope belonging to the F District of the Daejeon District Police Station in charge of the duty of report 112 from India reported the Defendants, the Defendants reported the said G as “D on the road at the risk,” and the said G expressed the desire to the said G as “Neh, which can be bit of bitch,” and the Defendant A sealed the body and the left part of the said G with the fingerbow, and the above assault was arrested by the F District of the Daejeon District Police Station in charge of the duty of report 112, and the Defendant B could arrest the flagrant offender at the time of the above arrest the son’s body and the son’s body.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

2. When the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the time, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) and was arrested as a flagrant offender and was on board the H patrol vehicle, according to the motor vehicle inspection estimate (Evidence No. 460,000,000,000 won of the repair cost according to the motor vehicle repair measurement sheet (Evidence No. 466,000,000,000 won of the record) in the said patrol vehicle, the Defendant accompanied the correction device of the said patrol gate No. 450,000 won.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the written estimate for automobile inspection maintenance;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 30(Selection of Imprisonment): Defendant B of the Criminal Act: Articles 136(1) and 30(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (Defendant B);

arrow