logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.18 2016고정156
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On November 13, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 13:30% of blood alcohol level, driven C Poter cargo from the section of the section of the area of the National Land Management and Utilization Act, from the entrance road of the offboard bus terminal located in Daejeon Jung-gu, to the front road of the animal source engineer restaurant located in the same Dong (hereinafter “instant restaurant”).

2. Determination

A. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant, while taking meals at the restaurant of this case, he saw the two remainings of the week of the lawsuit, he saw the vehicle into a string door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, and parked the vehicle in front of the restaurant, and reported the vehicle to the police again at the cafeteria, and reported it to the police again at the cafeteria, while waiting for the police, the blood alcohol concentration of this case at the time of driving is not the value at the time of the vehicle.

B. According to the records, the following facts are acknowledged.

① On November 13, 2015, the Defendant issued a meal at the instant restaurant on November 13, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the date and time shall be omitted) and sent to a trucking lane outside the restaurant to pay food value at around 13:30.

② D, an employee of the instant restaurant, thought that the Defendant completed meal and took care of the meals, and was unable to provide meals and spawn disease. At the time, 1/3 of the 1/3 of the spawn’s disease remains.

③ The Defendant returned to the restaurant, set a tin-open door in the instant restaurant, and asked D/ E, an employee of the instant restaurant, to d/E, and again, around 13:40, the Defendant reported 112 at around 13:54 at around 13:54.

(4)

arrow