1. On March 2015, the Defendant: (a) KRW 1,743,052,731 to the Plaintiff Liber, and KRW 17,721,30 among them, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s status as the parties

(2) The subsidiaries of PIL, including PIL and Plaintiff PDL, have their main offices in the UK as subsidiaries in the UK. The affiliates of PIL conduct business related to the production and supply of sets, including PVC sets, and Plaintiff PDL manufactures PVC sets at the factory located in its domicile. (2) Plaintiff Generali and Plaintiff AIG (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) are insurance companies running insurance business in the UK.

3) The Defendant is a company that is engaged in the manufacture and sale of various industrial chemical products and their materials, electronic equipment materials, batteries, and their materials, and is established pursuant to the law of the Republic of Korea and has its main office in the Republic of Korea. (b) The Plaintiff’s TPP and the Defendant are companies that have its main offices in the Republic of Korea. (c) The Plaintiff’s TPP mixing with the PVC in the process of manufacture in order to enhance the strength of the PV sets that it manufactures, and from around 2008, purchased and used the IMO808A (hereinafter “instant product”).

Part V Fire-Fighting Measures 4) Minimum-Powered Energy (MIE), hereinafter referred to as MIE

(2) At the time of supplying the instant product to the Plaintiff, the substance safety and health data (M Rate Scet; hereinafter “MSS”) in July 2003, which was provided by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, contained the following matters in relation to fire risks: (a) there was a minor fire risk in fire and explosion; (b) there was a powder or explosion; (c) there was a dust/air mixture; and (d) there was a fire risk.

3. On December 16, 2009, Plaintiff PDL sent to the Defendant a purchase order stating that the Plaintiff would purchase 40 tons of the instant product at US$ 86,000, and the Defendant is the status of Plaintiff PDL on December 24, 2009.