The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. From around 2015, the Defendant: (a) from around D dental services rendered by the victim C (the age of 48) to undergo dental treatment, the Defendant was provided with dental treatment in the D dental services for the victim C (the age of 48);

I think of the victim's complaint against the victim on February 2, 2016, and from the defendant's house located in Daegu Northern-gu 102 Dong 303, Daegu Northern-gu, 2016 to the mobile phone with the above D D D D D dental services, the victim "to issue to the victim for weather and treatment";

Hadra Doz. Doz. Doz.

“I have expressed my bath to mean “Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that Is that I

And the diagnosis is not a proposal but a doctor.

I would like to hear the explanation of “I”, “Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre.”

Sixth, I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I

Sixth, the victim made a threat as if he/she would inflict any harm on the body of the victim by talking that the victim could have been able to do so.

2. Determination

A. Legal provisions applicable to facts charged: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) An expression of intent of the victim not to punish him/her after public prosecution is instituted: A written agreement on August 4, 2016;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);