1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On April 23, 2001, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "the Islamic Republic of Pakistan"), who is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "the Republic of Germany"), entered and stays in the Republic of Korea as "technical training (D-3)" and changed the status of stay on April 19, 2003 to "training employment (E-8)", and continued to stay after the expiration of the above status of stay on August 31, 2005, and left the Republic of Pakistan on August 21, 2006.

Since then, the Plaintiff repeated entry into and departure from Korea several times from September 14, 2011 to January 5, 2013, and continued to enter the Republic of Korea as “short-term visit (C-3)” on March 14, 2013, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on February 25, 2015 while the Plaintiff was staying in the Republic of Korea.

On March 27, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on refugee non-recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a sufficiently-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution as prescribed in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 27, 2015, but the foregoing objection was dismissed on May 31, 2016.

[Grounds for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings of this case as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case is legitimate, and the plaintiff was divingd at the house located in Pakistan on February 10, 2013, and three tamps invaded into the house and demanded money to threaten the plaintiff.

Accordingly, even though the Plaintiff had paid 200,000 U.S. dollars to the leader, the Plaintiff demanded to pay more than 180,000 U.S. dollars, and the Plaintiff expressed a letter of intent to pay 180,000 U.S. dollars to the Plaintiff. As such, since the above leader threatens the Plaintiff to pay money to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff constitutes a refugee who is in danger of persecution.

It is as stated in the relevant statutes.

Judgment

The "Refugee" is a race, religion, nationality, and a particular social group.