1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On January 18, 2005, the Plaintiff, a foreigner with the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Islamistan (hereinafter referred to as "the Republic of Islamic Republic"), entered and staying in the Republic of Korea as "technical training (D-3)" and changed the status of stay on January 11, 2006 to "training employment (E-8)" and left the Republic of Korea on December 20, 207.

On October 23, 2010, the Plaintiff applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on July 1, 2015 while he/she continued to stay after the expiration of the above status of stay on February 20, 2008, after re-entry into the status of non-professional employment (E-9) sojourn.

On August 26, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on refugee non-recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a sufficiently-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution as prescribed in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on September 7, 2015, but the foregoing objection was dismissed on December 14, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case in comparison with the plaintiff's death villages around 2008, the plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to the plaintiff's assertion as to the facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole argument is as follows. The plaintiff's assertion as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate constitutes a refugee who is in danger of persecution since the plaintiff's personal injury is threatened by threatening the plaintiff by finding the plaintiff and threatening the plaintiff in a place near the house for the PMFN for the purpose of securing the support of the PMFN party.

It is as stated in the relevant statutes.

Judgment

“Refugee” is a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by a State of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she is detrimental to race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a particular social group or political opinion, or due to such fear.