logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.01.11 2016고합126
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the Director General of the Office of Affairs of “D”, and Defendant B is the executive member of the above gathering.

Despite the fact that the Defendants did not publish false facts about the candidates to be disadvantageous to the candidates by means of speech, communication, newspaper, communication, poster, propaganda document, or other means, with the intention of preventing the candidates from being elected in connection with the intra-party competition, the Defendants conspired to publish false facts about G with the intention of preventing the candidates from being elected in the competition for the National Assembly members in the F constituency conducted by the E political party.

Accordingly, on February 22, 2016, the Defendants sent to the office of “D organization”, “I organization”, “J organization”, “K organization”, “L organization”, “M organization”, etc., the second floor of H building, and led the Defendants to cooperate with the members of the Gu.”

G Council member was subject to criticism that it was revealed that her husband employed a minor in a singing room operated by her husband.

N was entered in the Republic of Korea, regardless of the past, such as T political parties and U.S. However, the personnel attached to the press conference with the same expertise, reform performance, and the following: (a) the part of the facts charged regarding the crime committed on February 22, 2016 (hereinafter “the facts charged regarding the crime committed on February 22, 2016”) and continuously led its press conference to the visitors at the same place on the 29th day of the same month (hereinafter “the first press conference”); (b) around 10:00 on the 29th day of the same month; and (c) through X, they led them to a public figure.

G Council member was subject to criticism that it was revealed that her husband employed a minor in a singing room operated by her husband.

The N has entered the area regardless of the past, such as T political parties and U.S. parties, with respect to the inclusion of the N in proportion to one another, but those personnel are the same expertise and expertise.

arrow