logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.11.14.선고 2019도13422 판결
살인,사체유기,사기,횡령,일반자동차방화미수,·자동차관리법위반,도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Cases

2019Do13422 homicide, abandonment of a corpse, fraud, embezzlement, general motor vehicle fire prevention;

Violation of the Automobile Management Act, Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving)

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Jeong Jae-joon (National Ship)

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court ( Jeju) Decision 2019No66 Decided August 28, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

November 14, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, relationship with victims, motive, means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, and the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s maintenance of the first instance judgment that sentenced the Defendant to 25 years of imprisonment, etc. is extremely unfair.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Lee In-bok et al.

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Noh Jeong-hee

Justices Kim Jae-hwan of the District Court

arrow