logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.02.15 2016고단3627
업무방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:20 on May 2, 2016, the Defendants considered that their children are responsible for the victims of harassment in a meeting organized by the victim D prior to his or her husband's death.

Nevertheless, the injured party did not go against the Defendants and avoided the Defendant’s telephone contact, and the Defendants sent a letter that they would find the victim as a private teaching institute.

However, the defendants do not see from the damaged person.

E. Me. Me. Me. Me. Me. Me. Me. Me. Me.

"As the word " was received, I would like to find it directly in the private teaching institute operated by the victim and would follow the victim.

On May 2, 2016, around 18:3, 2016, the Defendants went to the “F Receiving Institute” operated by the injured party on the 7th floor of the E building at Kimhae-si.

In that place, Defendant A is the victim’s “Irdo Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do .”

Defendant B is to operate a private teaching institute according to his own sound.

the president means that person does so;

It was difficult to avoid disturbance for about 20 minutes, such as putting it in large sound.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's private teaching institute business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Determination as to the defendants and their defense counsel's assertion on photographs (the victim's cell phone contents sent to the victim's cell phone by the victim at the time of storage of the victim's cell phone)

1. The summary of the assertion is that the Defendants found the victim’s driving school and provided normal dialogue with the victim, and do not interfere with the operation of the driving school.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, the Defendants may fully recognize the fact that the victimized party has obstructed the operation of a private teaching institute by large sounds. Therefore, the Defendants and defense counsel.

arrow