logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.08.10 2015고단1947
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around May 28, 2015, around 07:25, on the grounds that F Hospital 367 located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and Victim B (F Hospital 33 years old) provided sick care and scambling scams at night, the victim was suffering from cosmetics, and the victim’s face, scam, and scam were hacked for about two weeks, and the victim’s face and scam were hacked for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Protocols concerning the interrogation of suspects A by the prosecution (including the part concerning B's statement);

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. A medical certificate of injury (B) and details of medical expenses;

1. Application of B photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment concerning the crime: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of a penalty);

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that Defendant A committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of being punished for an violent crime, the fact that Defendant A committed the instant crime is disadvantageous to Defendant A. The fact that Defendant A led to confession of the instant crime and reflects on the instant crime is favorable to Defendant A.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.

The acquittal portion

1. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the facts of the crime, was charged against Defendant B, was charged with A, was sealed with A, the head of A, and the face of A was charged with injury, such as dynasium and tension on the bones of wood, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B’s summary of Defendant B’s assertion argues that “A’s head debt or face is not low, and there is only the enemy who sealed A at a passive defense level in the course of unilaterally taking an assault from A, and the fact that A suffered injury cannot be acknowledged.”

3. Determination A.

arrow