Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants operated the corporation E as a partnership business.

In 2014, the Defendants entered into a contract with F to purchase KRW 9 and KRW 10,90,000,000, which is owned by F. The Defendants paid the down payment of KRW 50,000,000,000, and the remainder was to be paid after remodeling the said two floors to the office, and the sales proceeds were to be distributed to KRW 5:5,00,000.

On October 1, 2014, the Defendants filed an application for the change of the use of the G building 9 floors and 10 floors to the office of 137 offices in the name of the head of the Gu/U.S. on October 1, 2014, but were likely to change the use of accommodation facilities (multi-living facilities) and business facilities (officetels) with the office of the Gu/U.S. on October 13, 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendants filed an administrative adjudication under the F’s name of “request for revocation of rejection disposition against the application for change of the former part of aggregate buildings” but received the ruling from the Gyeonggi-do Administrative Trial Committee on March 25, 2015 that the said request is dismissed.

The Defendants, on August 28, 2015, filed an application for the partial change of the former G building 10, and on October 15, 2015, filed an application for the partial change of the former G building 9 to 18 offices.

However, the Defendants formally installed a toilet on the 9th and 10th and the 18th and the above 18 offices of each of the above G buildings, and applied for repair as such. The actual construction was intended to construct a structure that can be used as accommodation facilities (multi-living facilities) and business facilities (tels) by installing individual toilets, unlike the design drawings.

When a civil petition was filed around October 20, 2015, the Gu office of the Republic of Korea visited the site on October 28, 2015 to offer guidance to the effect that construction works, etc. do not violate the law. On November 3, 2015, the government office sent to the Defendants a written public notice to that effect.

Defendants on November 2015.