1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the alteration of part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

o. The duty to promote safe driving is recognized in cases where a driver drives abnormal driving or a traffic environment, such as road conditions and weather conditions, was high, and the passenger was able to be aware of such circumstances in advance as at the time of the instant accident. However, it is insufficient to recognize that there were such circumstances at the time of the instant accident. Since there is no other evidence, the “F” of the 7,8 conduct under o 3 pages 6,7 conduct below (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da39080, Jan. 24, 1997), the Defendant’s assertion that the above change of the income amount from the 1st 6,7 conduct to the “A” (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Da206853, Sept. 10, 2015) is reasonable to temporarily change the income from the 1st 6,707 conduct bonus (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Da206853, supra).).