Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM7 car.

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of about 87.5 kilometers from the center of a square to the center of a square, the front direction of the E, which is located in D at Jinnam-si, Jinnam-si, was driven at a speed of about 87.5 kilometers from the center of a square to the center of a square.

It is a limited place at a speed of 60 kilometers and a place where a crosswalk is installed immediately before the accident location. In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check and drive the way by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim F (n, 61 years of age) and the victim G (n, 58 years of age) who passed the road on the right side from the left side of the moving direction due to the negligence of driving the speed exceeding about 87.5 kilometers per hour, beyond a speed of 27.5 kilometers per hour, and caused the victims to go beyond the top part of the Defendant driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim F’s occupational negligence, such as the injury to the 10-day upper frames, which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim G, such as the right frame, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony of the witness H and I;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A comprehensive traffic accident analysis report (the defendant is an error in the motor vehicle booming device, so the result of the analysis based on the black image cannot be accepted, but there is no explanation as to the error in the motor vehicle booming device, and therefore, the defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted, and the fact of violation of speed limit by the above evidence can be acknowledged).

1. Trabbbbs and video CDs in the accident vehicle;

1.An accident vehicle stored in a police PC.