logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.18 2018고합74
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be sentenced to imprisonment of three years and six months, and Defendant B shall be sentenced.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on January 24, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 1, 2018.

[Criminal facts] 2018 Gohap 74

1. Defendant A

A. On October 26, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (i.e., brokerage, etc.), advertised commercial sex acts through the “F”, which is a mobile phone-rating fluoring fluor around the Eel area located in Ansan-si, Ma-gu, Ansan-si, Around October 26, 2017, and agreed to engage in commercial sex acts and to engage in commercial sex acts with male and female influorious names who reported commercial sex acts.

Between G (n.e., 18 years of age) and k3 cars with the promise place, the said G had the said G receive 150,000 won a sexual traffic price and had the said male and sexual intercourse with the above name, and arranged sexual traffic over about 40 times from around that time until December 23, 2017.

As a result, the defendant has mediated the purchase of sex of G, a child or juvenile, as a business.

B. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) (the Defendant, at around 18:30 on January 9, 2018, planned to advertise commercial sex acts through mobile phone-rating marcing F, a mobile phone-rating marcing in Ecoms located in the Ecoms located in Ansan-gu, Ma-gu, Ansan-si, 2018, and agreed to engage in commercial sex acts with men in an unfortunate name and sexual traffic.

Between G (n. H L.) and B’s promise place in K3 car, G had G receive 150,000 won for sexual traffic and have sexual intercourse with the above name, and arranged sexual traffic over about 20 times from around 10,000 to February 10, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant has arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant B advertised sexual traffic around 12:00 on November 18, 2017 through F, a cell phone-type display-type “F,” and Defendant B’s name and non-consigned male and sexual traffic, which reported and contacted with the Defendant.

arrow