1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s claim is established around September 15, 2007, which was established around September 15, 2007, prior to June 27, 2012, which was the date of the conclusion of the instant mortgage contract. As such, the Plaintiff’s claim is the preserved claim for the revocation of the instant fraudulent act.

B. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 14, 21, Eul evidence Nos. 14 through 16 (including each number), the Korea Federation of Banks in the first instance court, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor, the head of the budget, the head of the National Gun, the National Bank, the National Agricultural Cooperatives, and the Hanyang Agricultural Cooperatives, the results of fact inquiry into the members' budget, and the results of fact inquiry into the members' budget. A) At the time of the contract of mortgage of this case, the status of Eul's active property at the time of the contract of mortgage of this case is as listed in the following table. As regards the real estate Nos. 6 through 8, the maximum debt amount of which is 520,000,000 won, and the voluntary auction is being conducted at the request of the

Serial value within the calendar 1 of the instant real estate 374,592,870 2, Chungcheongnamnam Budget Group F, G, H, I, K, L, M, N, AG, P, AH, Q, Q, AH, Q, 112,285,50,500 4, Chungcheongnam-gun 3,500 5,000 1,50 1,500 1,50 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 6, 3306,350,3506/350 6, 3006/350 42,70,750,700 70, 7610, 761, 406, 7506, 797, 196, 767, 196, 306, 197, 306, 306, 197