logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.11.29 2018고단1762
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:35 on May 13, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) was discovered to G police officers belonging to the same maritime police station, who received a report from G with 200 meters away from the front day of the “C” in Busan Shipping Daegu, to the front day of the “E” main day in Busan Shipping Daegu D, while driving a FHF vehicle at approximately 200 meters in the state of alcohol.

At the time, there was a statement by the reporter that "the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol", smelled from the defendant, and he was a little colored, and he was driving under the influence of alcohol by the defendant, such as a little vision of walking.

Since there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the above circumstances: (a) the Defendant was at the influence of alcohol using a drinking reduction device; (b) the Defendant was at the influence of alcohol; and (c) the Defendant was requested from the H district of the Shipping Station of the Korea Shipping Station in Busan J in Busan in response to the measurement of alcohol by inserting approximately four times from about 19:12 on the same day to about 19:37 on the same day; (d) the Defendant avoided this; and (e) the Defendant did not comply with the police officer’s request for the measurement of alcohol without good cause.

2. On May 13, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 18:45, on the front of the “E” main point located in Busan Shipping Daegu D, G, the developments leading up to the request for a measurement of drinking on the roads in front of the “E” main point, and whether the Defendant determined that the Defendant “I and G, as seen above, is driving within the fine not exceeding finite

“Abruting,” such as “Abruting,” and the warning from K during the course of the said patrol, she saw the face of K one time by hand. Abruting around 18:52 on the same day, he was arrested as a flagrant offender at around 18:52, and was arrested as a flagrant offender at around 3 patrols, and was led to the Defendant’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’ from the patrol.

arrow