1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is the Defendant.

(b) comply with the request of the recipient to borrow money in his name;

B. On May 28, 2018, the Defendant signed a real estate sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) on May 28, 2018, which was prepared by the Intervenor F by forging the name of F, and signed on the buyer’s column. The Defendant prepared a loan certificate (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”) with the Defendant joining the Defendant, along with the Defendant joining the Defendant. The aforementioned real estate sales contract and the loan certificate are as follows.

1) The subject matter of the instant sales contract is KRW 570,000,000 for purchase price of D apartment E head of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government KRW 570,000 for KRW 50,000 for the purchase price - the intermediate payment of KRW 130,000 for KRW 130,000 for the contract date - the intermediate payment of KRW 100,000 for June 19, 2018 - the seller F who pays the remainder of KRW 390,000 for the remainder of KRW 390,000 for the purchase price, and Defendant 2 for the purchase price: The date of borrowing KRW 50,00 for the loan (e.g., 50,000 for the purchase price) on June 19, 2018: Fees on July 13, 2018; the amount above shall be borrowed to the Plaintiff.

* Trading and intermediate payment of D apartment E, . June 19, 2018, the Defendant (Appellant) joining the Defendant (Appellant)

C. On the same day, the Plaintiff issued to the Intervenor joining the Defendant 50 million won a check the amount of KRW 48.5 million after deducting the interest of KRW 1.5 million from the interest of KRW 50 million.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant was convicted of the Seoul Northern District Court on the ground that he was convicted of the Defendant’s charges, such as “if the Defendant, based on the forged sales contract of this case, by deceiving the Plaintiff that he would complete payment not later than July 13, 2018, as the intermediate payment would be insufficient to purchase the apartment, and the Defendant would loan KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff, and that he received KRW 48.5 million from the Plaintiff and acquired it by fraud.”

(2019No758). On the other hand, the defendant entered his name in the buyer column of the sales contract of this case, and was investigated by the charge that the defendant aided and abetted the morale of the defendant joining the defendant by preparing the loan certificate of this case to the plaintiff, but it is found that the defendant was guilty, but there is no same kind of fact, and the defendant joining the defendant.