logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.17 2017고단1260
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 25, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000,000 as a fine for a violation of Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court’s net support on October 25, 2007; and on November 2, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 250,00,00,000 as a fine for a violation of Road Traffic Act.

On June 6, 2017, at around 20:00, the Defendant driven a car in Dcoon with approximately 10k alcohol concentration from the section of approximately 10km from the front line of the trade infinite cremation to the first road of the same city, which is located in the same city level, to the IC road.

2. On October 25, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for a violation of Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on October 25, 2007, and on November 2, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a crime of violation of Road Traffic Act (driving under drinking), and on June 30, 2017, the Defendant was not detained for a violation of Road Traffic Act (driving under drinking) and is still pending trial.

On July 27, 2017, the Defendant driven a spke car in the E-frequency state under the influence of alcohol content of 0.068%, without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the restaurant, which does not know the trade name located in the YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, YY, and YY, from the front of the restaurant to the front of the second apartment.

As a result, the Defendant was a person who had a driving force under drinking not less than twice, and was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a statement on the circumstances of each driving driver, and inquiring about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger (No. 5 No. 2017 order No. 1529)

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, copies of a summary order, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes in indictment;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking), Article 152 subparagraph 1, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow