logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.07.12 2018고단985
특수상해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

, however, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapons, etc.) in the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court on May 28, 2015 and completed the execution of the said sentence in a wooden prison on May 23, 2017.

[2018 Highest985]

1. On September 14, 2018, Defendant A: (a) around 22:15, the “F” operated by E in Sinposi-si; (b) the Defendant’s cell phone (S6, 15cm in length) of the Defendant, which is a dangerous object in possession of the victim B (the age of 50) of the party interested in the above E and related parties, was placed at the victim’s face, and was 20cm above the number of days of treatment on the left side of the victim.

2. Defendant B suffered assault as above from the victim A (year 61) at the time, place, and at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), and against this, Defendant B raised approximately 3 cm from the victim’s head on the part of the victim’s head when the victim’s head was faced with an empty beer who was a dangerous object on his customer.

[2019 Highest 184] On February 26, 2019, Defendant A sent the victim C(54 years of age) to the “H” office on the second floor G 2nd floor in Mapopo-si, brea-si, breathly in the influence of alcohol, exchanged the victim C(54 years of age) with each other without any reason, and broken the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object in the side during the dispute, to the floor, followed by the remaining angle, and then, Defendant A sustained the victim’s left part of the knife, and caused the victim’s injury, such as “a multi-dive wound open for about three weeks of treatment.”

[2019 Highest 260] Defendant A, at around 14:00 on February 9, 2019, was satis on the second floor of the building located in G, the second floor of the “H” branch of the building located in G, demanding the victim I (the age of 57) who satising the satis together with the satise, but was refused. As such, Defendant A’s satisfing the victim’s satisfes that require approximately four weeks of treatment. As such, Defendant A’s satisfsatisfying the satise floor of the satise water which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

arrow