logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.18 2013가합523990
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is the owner of the 5th floor building on the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground (hereinafter “instant building”), and Defendant B is a person who operates the instant restaurant with the trade name “E” by leasing part of the above building from Defendant C (hereinafter “instant restaurant”).

B. In the direction of entering the restaurant of this case from the outside of the building of this case, there is an corridor first, the wall at the end of the corridor contains the trade name of the restaurant of this case, and there is a door leading to the right side of the corridor, and there is a door leading to the toilet to the right side, and there is a door leading to the stairs connected to the underground of the above building (hereinafter “instant stairs”).

In addition, the entrance of the restaurant of this case is opened between the corridor and the door of this case, and the door of this case passed, and the entrance of this case leads to the place in which customers can take meals.

C. On January 10, 201, around 19:00, the Plaintiff, along with the branch figures, has been eating the instant restaurant, out of the instant stairs.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

After the occurrence of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was sent to Korea National University Ansan Hospital and undergone an operation, such as climatic surgery, after he was conducted, such as climatic surgery, after he was conducted, and was diagnosed by climatic damage (pactical 3, 4, 5) and climatic typosis (pactical 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). The Plaintiff was diagnosed by climatic typosis (pactical 5) and was diagnosed by climatic typosis (pactical s

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 9 (including a satisfy number; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness F’s testimony, the result of the court’s commission of physical appraisal to the director of the Central University Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff 1’s assertion that the parties concerned the instant stairs in question were dissip, do not knife, do not knife, and does not turn knife, the instant text requires to take care of the stairs.

arrow