beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months;
However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who is engaged in driving of motor vehicles, and Defendant B is Kwikset Service.
1. Defendant A
A. On May 17, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license at around 04:17, 2015, driven DYF YF Ba car and moved back to the parking lot on the side of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon apartment zone. Since there are many commercial areas where people have access, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is in a large area. In such a case, a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle is negligent in driving the victim F. (n. 24 years old), who was walking behind the motor vehicle (n. 24 years old), by neglecting the duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the dong and steering devices in the vicinity of the motor vehicle, and by taking the back part of the above motor vehicle, suffered injuries, such as chilled chills requiring treatment for about two weeks, resulting in an injury to the victim, and did not immediately stop the vehicle and take necessary measures, such as escape.
B. At around 11:00 on May 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) asked the Defendant B to undergo an investigation instead of as if the Defendant was the driver of the instant Claim 1; and (b) instigated B to have the police officer who investigated the instant case make a statement as if he/she was killed in the accident and escaped; and (c) compel B to escape the person who committed a crime equivalent to a fine or heavier punishment by having the police officer who did the instant case make a statement as if he/she had escaped, as described in paragraph 2.
2. Defendant B, at around 14:39, May 18, 2015, at the Daejeonsan Police Station guard and traffic, and at the office of the Nice Investigation Team, Defendant B, a police officer investigating a traffic accident as referred to in Article 1(a) of the above Act, made a false statement as if the Defendant had escaped from a traffic accident according to A’s teacher and made a false statement as if he/she had escaped, thereby allowing the Defendant to escape from a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.