logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고정507
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a CM5 car volume.

At around 04:40 on May 6, 2013, while under the influence of alcohol 0.153% of blood alcohol concentration ( apparatus measurement), the said vehicle was driven under the influence of alcohol in approximately one kilometer from the area near the aftermath of the Gangwon National University, which was in effect automatic in Chuncheon, to the aftermain in front of vain in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Cracking the results of the drinking driving control, and control photographs;

1. Photographs near the exposed place;

1. In the following circumstances, the Defendant alleged that he was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the police control, but did not drive the vehicle. However, the Defendant was on board the driver’s seat of the vehicle with the starting engine while wearing a safety labelling at the time of his lawful adoption by the court. In other words, the Defendant was on board the vehicle with the starting engine while wearing a safety labelling (if he left the vehicle without leaving the vehicle, as alleged by the Defendant, he must have the head of the steering engine, the Defendant would have been under the influence of the vehicle). ② ② The location of the vehicle where the Defendant was under the stop of the vehicle at the seat of the vehicle, which the Defendant was under the stop, was one-lane and immediately preceding the signal line (if the vehicle was under the influence of the Defendant, it is difficult to purchase the Defendant’s assertion that he left the vehicle at the center of the vehicle without moving the vehicle to the side), ③ In light of the fact that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the point of the police station and the Defendant was under the influence of the vehicle.

arrow