The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant, without knowledge of the victim before and after the vehicle at the time of the instant case, unfolded the bark from the bark so far as naturally pushed the bark, and did not assault the victim by intentionally moving the vehicle.

2. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court may recognize the fact that the Defendant intentionally left a vehicle and assaulted the victim.

① According to the CCTV screen photographs, the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the instant case can be recognized as having 20 cm back at least (Evidence No. 18 of the Evidence Records). (2) At the lower court court’s court, the victim sent the front door to the Defendant.

The defendant's "drawing off the match, parking, and cutting off the match."

(3) Unless there are special circumstances, such as that the driver of a vehicle is familiar with the operation of a vehicle, the driver of a vehicle using a large number of vehicles stated to the effect that “the driver reads to a certain degree of sound” (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 67~68, Sept. 68, 199). The driver of a vehicle using a large number of vehicles is in accord with the empirical rule to take a back-up after the brashing of the bral bral peds while taking the bral pedal pedal pedal pedals, and then after

Therefore, the defendant's assertion that the damaged person was unaware of whether the damaged person was in the front part of the vehicle, or that the balke naturally sealed the balke, is not persuasive.

④ The Defendant alleged that “a manual rolling stock cannot be used to put in a flag and turn back, so the victim’s statement is false.” However, if the Defendant was in a neutral state, it is possible to turn back the manual.

⑤ Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that the victim was a victim after the instant vehicle, sent the engine to the victim to the public; (b) however, (c) provided the victim with the vehicle left the vehicle slowly, the Defendant anticipated that the victim would follow the vehicle.