1. On December 23, 2014, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From November 5, 2013, the Plaintiff was a person who became a member of the Company B and worked as a pipeline hole. On December 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on November 27, 2014, after being diagnosed as “cerebral typhism, cardiopathic spathic, and detailed mythic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathics

B. On December 23, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical treatment (the instant disposition) on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relationship between the work and the injury and disease because the Plaintiff was suffering from cerebral conditions while being hospitalized into another disease (compacting disease). However, on the ground that there was no rapid change in the work environment or chronic stress on the part of the Plaintiff, it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relationship between the work and the injury and disease (the instant disposition was conducted under the following).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The Plaintiff asserted that: (a) the Plaintiff was hiding on December 17, 2013, and the Plaintiff applied to the first hospital for an open symptoms; (b) it was a typical symptoms of cardiopulmonary consent; and (c) brain color that occurred on December 27, 2013 was caused by cardiopulmonary resuscitation that occurred on December 17, 2013.

However, the Plaintiff worked for at least 10 hours a day after becoming a stock company B on November 5, 2013, and worked at night without holidays until the day before the symptoms of the first heart consent occur. The instant disposition made on a different premise is unlawful, even though the cardiopulmonary Bribery occurred due to the excess and the cardiopulmonary Bribery occurred on December 27, 2013.

B. (1) On November 5, 2013, the Plaintiff joined the E-factory construction company B (hereinafter below, Nonparty 2) and cut off old pipes at the E-factory construction site located in Leecheon-si, Gyeonggi-do.