The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the Defendant’s determination on the grounds for appeal of this case is contrary to the recognition of all the crimes of this case, and the fact that the vehicle driven by the Defendant appears to have been covered by liability insurance and its bereaved family members would have paid KRW 100 million insurance money, etc. are considered favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol without a driver's license, stops the bicycle immediately while driving the motor vehicle without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victim. The crime of this case is not good. The victim's death resulting from the traffic accident of this case and causing damage to the victim, and the defendant was punished by drinking driving on several occasions. In addition, even though the defendant requested formal trial on the summary order due to a traffic accident caused without a driver's license at the time of this case, the traffic accident of this case occurred while driving the motor vehicle again and was under trial, and the victim's bereaved family members did not reach an agreement until the trial. The victim's bereaved family members want not reach an agreement by the time of the crime of this case. The scope of recommending punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee for the crime of this case is three to five years, and the defendant's family relation relation area is in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes / [Determination of traffic accident, traffic accident after the victim, the defendant's age, the defendant's motive or sentencing range.