The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The punishment of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant has recognized his mistake, that the victim wants to take the preference against the defendant by agreement with the victim, that the vehicle of the defendant has been covered by liability insurance, that most of the damage has been recovered, and that there are children who have to support the defendant.

However, on November 11, 2014, immediately before the instant crime was committed, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine one time due to drinking and unlicensed driving. On November 11, 2014, which was immediately before the instant crime, the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine due to drinking and unlicensed driving, and the appellate court continued to run the appellate court, thereby causing injury to the victim. The nature of the instant crime and the circumstances of the instant crime, the injury to the victim, etc. are very bad, are disadvantageous factors for sentencing. In addition, considering the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission (not less than six months), and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission (not less than six months): The Defendant’s decision on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes [the Decision on the Sentencing], the sentencing guidelines set by the sentencing guidelines set by the sentencing guidelines set by the sentencing guidelines set by the minimum range of imprisonment range of not less than three months (one months or more than six months).

3. Conclusion.