logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.16 2013고단2841
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant

A The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the above punishment shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a driver of the EM5 vehicle, Defendant B is a driver of the Fran vehicle.

Defendant

On March 29, 2013, A driving the said SM5 car around 20:28, and driving the said SM5 car along the two-lanes between the two-lanes, one-lanes, from the middle-distance shooting distance range to the middle-distance shooting range.

In addition, Defendant B driving the said radar car and driving it on the road in front of the said KT TT T-ray driving direction for the said SM5 car driving zone, and driving on the road in front of the said SM5 car driving direction at a speed of about 43 km of speed depending on the two-lanes of speed.

On the front side where the Defendants were underway, there was a crosswalk where signal lights are not installed, the surrounding areas frequent pedestrians’ passage to commercial areas. At the same time, it was not good to view the front side due to the headlights light of other vehicles passing at night, etc. In such a case, the Defendants have a duty of care to reduce speed and to prevent pedestrians from standing on the front side and right side of the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, Defendant A neglected this and went through the front part of the above SM5 vehicle in the direction of the road from the left side of the course due to the occupational negligence, and Defendant A tried to play the victim H by driving the above SM5 vehicle in the future of the victim H who opened the road along the crosswalk in the direction of G immediately behind G, and let the victim H play or go beyond the floor.

In addition, Defendant B is also negligent in performing the above duty of care in front of the crosswalk, and due to occupational negligence while passing the crosswalk without reducing the speed at all, Defendant B’s above rash on the part of the victim B’s head head going beyond the road as above before Defendant B entered the crosswalk.

arrow