A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's Maritime Branch on November 30, 2007, and the same drinking driving force is more than once.

1. Around September 18, 2013, the Defendant had expressed an attitude of threatening the victim’s body, i.e., a dangerous object accumulated in a stone fence on the ground that the Defendant’s vehicle driven by the victim D (the age of 49) will not block the front of the E-Poter truck drivened by the Defendant, with the vehicle driven by the victim D (the age of 49). As such, the Defendant threatened the victim with a dangerous object, and continued to pose a threat to the victim, i.e., a vehicle aboard the said dangerous object, such as a sudden delay, as he would have been expected to receive a vehicle aboard the victim from the said truck.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement of drinking level) on September 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Dondo Police Station G police box located in F of the Dondonam-gun, around 19:5 on September 19, 2013; and (b) there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving while under the influence of alcohol, such as taking a serious smell in the Defendant’s entrance, taking a breaon on his face, etc.; (c) the Defendant requested a police officer to comply with the request for a measurement of drinking level by inserting approximately 30 minutes of drinking volume from the slope He affiliated with the said G police box to put the b

3. On September 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was arrested in and waiting for the commission of a crime in the act of committing the crime set forth in paragraph (1) at the above G police box around 19:40 on September 19, 2013; (b) obstructed the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of reported duties by the above I, by assaulting the Defendant, such as: (c) the chief of the police box affiliated with the above G police box, by blocking the Defendant from walking the scambling, by walking the scambling part of the above I’s bridge; and (d) attempted to see the above I with the

Summary of Evidence

1..