A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 30, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) led to a two-lane road in front of the 766-lane No. 766-ro, Nowon-do, Nowon-do, Nowon-do, Nowon-do, Nowon-do, to proceed at an insular speed from the old middle school room to the outflow of the oil station.

Since the place is where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to those engaged in driving of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the front part of the E-Poter Cargo Driving by the victim D, who was driving in the opposite direction due to the negligent negligence of the central line, to be the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment from the victim D (year 66) due to the above occupational negligence, such as the left-hand fluoral fluorg around the original fluort inserted.

2. On November 30, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement of drinking), even though he was requested to comply with a drinking test by inserting approximately 30 minutes of a drinking measuring instrument between a slope He and a police officer’s request for a drinking test by inserting the brea in a drinking measuring instrument over 30 minutes, on the grounds that there exist reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol at the G police box of the Dondo Police Station in F of the Dondo Police Station, Jeonnam-gun, Seoul, about 18:00 on November 30, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Investigation report (prinking, measuring and refusing to affix seals);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of traffic accident evidence examination and photographing statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (1) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of refusing to measure noise, the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code and Article 38 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.