1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates the Suwon University, and the Intervenor is a teacher who has served on a one-year basis after being appointed as a full-time lecturer at the above university B and a full-time lecturer on March 1, 2011.

B. On January 2, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for reappointment with the Intervenor, and drafted an agreement for the appointment of teachers with the following contents:

[Agreement on Appointment of Teachers] Article 1 (Agreement on Appointment of Teachers and Positions) (referring to intervenors; hereinafter the same shall apply) shall be an assistant professor.

Article 2 (Period of Appointment) The term of appointment for Article 2 (Period of Appointment) shall be from March 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015 (monthly).

Article 4 (Obligations, etc. of Teachers) (1) In performing his/her duties, he/she shall comply with the Regulations on Personnel Management of Teaching Staff, other service regulations, etc. prescribed by A (referring to the President of the Korea Institute of Education; hereinafter the same shall apply).

③ During the period from November 1, 2013 to October 31, 2014, Eul shall publish at least two copies of this paper and two copies of this paper in his/her entry into a research foundation in a well-known overseas academic site (SI, SCI, A&HCI), and shall acquire at least 85 points in his/her achievement evaluation (research-oriented type) conducted in the main school, and shall actively contribute to the development of the main school through education and research.

C. In September 2014, the Plaintiff demanded the Intervenor to submit data on the evaluation of achievements to examine the reappointment. On October 31, 2014, the Intervenor submitted to the Plaintiff an application for reappointment, including data on the evaluation of achievements.

However, on November 21, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the intervenors that they failed to meet the criteria for reappointment of teachers as a result of the evaluation of teachers’ services. From November 25, 2014 to December 10, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted a letter of vindication relating to the evaluation of teachers’ services or notified the intervenors that they could attend the teachers’ personnel committee and state their opinions on December 11, 2014, and the Intervenor submitted a written vindication on November 26, 2014.

The Plaintiff shall deliberate on the teachers' personnel committee of December 11, 2014 and the resolution of the board of directors of December 29, 2014 to the Intervenor on December 30, 2014.