logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.05.11 2017고정640
보조금관리에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

V is punished by a fine of 4 million won.

Defendant

If V does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

AA, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K, K,W, L, M, M, N, P, Q, Q, R, T, and U are the merchants belonging to each of the above committees.

X, on February 2, 2014, with the knowledge that the Si subsidy was 60% from AB viewing, and 40% of the self-paid charges was implemented, the Defendant, who is the president of the Z apartment building association, was found to have applied for the maintenance project of the Z apartment building, to the effect that “the Defendant, who is the president of the Z apartment building association, applied for the maintenance project to prevent the self-paid costs.” The Defendant’s consent was obtained.

Accordingly, the Defendant, including AA on February 4, 2014, may replace the signboard only with the Si subsidy without his/her own share, to the merchants belonging to the above shopping mall.

“Along with the consent of the affiliated merchants to carry out a signboard improvement project on the same day, the committee for promotion of the signboard improvement project was formed and the X was contracted as the signboard installers of the project, thereby soliciting to receive subsidies from AB viewing.

In addition, in applying for the above signboard improvement project to AB viewing, X and the Defendant deposited the money equivalent to the charges that X first deposited in the account in the name of the Defendant, the Chairperson of the Promotion Committee, and received a decision to support the signboard improvement project, the above money was returned by X.

Pursuant to the aforementioned program, the Defendant, on February 4, 2014, did not intend to have the merchants belonging to the relevant company bear the relevant shares, and applied for subsidies with the written consent of the relevant company as if he/she were to implement a project for improving the signboard although he/she did not intend to have them bear the shares on the list of offenses listed in the separate sheet of crimes, and X applied for subsidies with the same content as if he/she were to implement a project for improving the signboard. On March 28, 2014, X KRW 41,148,00, which is equivalent

arrow