All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. (1) As to the part of the facts charged of the instant case, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this case’s murdering charges in light of the following: (a) the Defendant and the person requesting an attachment order (hereinafter “the Defendant”)’s price and the degree of and methods for assaulting the victim; (b) the victim’s 160cm and 60km in body; (c) the victim’s 60km in body; and (d) the victim’s main function as a result of autopsy is extensive and concentrated on the head with weak body function as a result of autopsy; (b) the Defendant’s life-sustaining blood, mathing, throsing, sprinking, and sprinking; and (c) the Defendant was aware of the victim’s injury to the victim’s body at the time of the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant was aware of the victim’s injury to the victim’s body at least before and after the death of the victim at the time of the crime; and (d) the Defendant’s motive and the victim’s motive at least before and after the crime were sufficiently anticipateded.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in accordance with the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s judgment is against logical and empirical rules and free evaluation of evidence.