The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. One-time, although the defendant's mistake and reflects it, the crime of this case committed by the defendant, which was committed by the defendant, has the record of committing the same kind of crime, and the defendant who was committed by the defendant is hard to open the mobile phone at the weekend and acquired the dry phone in advance after he applied for opening the mobile phone at the weekend (the victims are all victims; the victims are the mobile phone sellers at the weekend, it was difficult to find out the credibility of the customers who applied for the mobile phone through the computer network at the end, and the conditions were operated by the method of opening the computer network at the end of the month in which the computer network was operated after delivering the cell phone device to them for the convenience of the customers, and the defendant was working in the way that the computer network was operated after being delivered the cell phone machine to him, and the method, period, frequency, the number of acquired mobile phones, and its value, etc. In addition, if it is not the weekend, it does not seem that the crime of this case was committed by using another person's name, and the circumstances and circumstances of the defendant's personal character and behavior are no more likely (261).

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.