logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.11.13 2015고단2318
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 2010, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “The victim, who had served in the military at the same place in the 17th session of Incheon City, was the president of the glass Company. From the time of the father’s solicitation, the Plaintiff began to acquire the investment of the shares from high school, is a stock expert and is at least KRW 4-500,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

However, in fact, the Defendant was making a stock investment of about KRW 10 million and was not a stock expert, but the father of the Defendant was not the president of the glass company, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to preserve the principal even if he did not receive money from others for the purpose of stock investment since there was no specific assets other than KRW 10 million as a soldier at the time.

Around August 30, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 22 million from the victim to the new bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant as an investment deposit.

2. Around January 2014, the Defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim of Ansan-si that “I would pay a large amount of money by investing in a foreign country to the friendship-gu and invest in this friendship-gu. I would like to make an investment if there is money with width. I would like to make an investment. The principal of the investment will be guaranteed.”

However, the Defendant was thought to use the money received from the victim as the gambling fund of the “F”, which is an illegal sports soil, and there was no particular income due to absence of a certain occupation. There was no intention or ability to preserve the principal even if the Defendant had received an investment from others, and even if having borrowed money from others, there was no intention or ability to repay the principal.

The Defendant is as above.

arrow