logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.18 2015가합206731
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 200, when the Daegu Metropolitan City was selected as a site for the 22th Summer Universiade to be held in the year 2003, the Daegu Metropolitan City determined the site for the construction of the Haak River Village as the Daegu District on September 2000, and established a project plan on the construction of the Haak River Village and the sale of the goods in lots, etc. after the completion of the construction of the Haak River Village and the competition, and entrusted the Defendant with the above business affairs.

B. Accordingly, around 2001, D apartment housing (hereinafter “instant apartment”) was supported by the National Housing Fund in the Daegu Northern-gu Seoul Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, and commenced as of April 2003 as the scheduled completion date for implementation of the public rental housing construction project. The Daegu-gu Metropolitan City Mayor announced the public rental housing announcement as follows on August 27, 2002.

[Period for public announcement of invitation of residents] The period for five years after the expiration of the initial period for the designation of occupancy shall be the average of the construction cost and the appraised value pursuant to Article 3-3 of the Enforcement Rule of the Rental Housing Act, and the period for sale conversion after five years from the following day after the expiration of the initial period for the designation of occupancy shall not exceed the amount obtained by deducting the depreciation costs of the rental period from the calculated price (interest on the housing site cost at the

C. At the Daegu Metropolitan City around January 2004, the plaintiffs except plaintiffs E, F, G, and H, and I, J, and K (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "seller") among each of the households of the apartment of this case.

2. The “Dong/Dong number” in the list is the respective households indicated in the list; the lease deposit is KRW 23 square 24,151,00; KRW 27,616,00; KRW 28 square 27,616,00; KRW 31 square 29,162,00; the lease term is set at five years from January 2004.

Plaintiff

E (SI, Plaintiff F (P No. 354) succeeded to each of the respective generations as K’s heir, Plaintiff G (P No. 258), and H (P No. 259).

The Daegu Metropolitan City concluded a sales contract with the buyer around February 2009 when the mandatory rental period of the apartment of this case expired, and calculated the pre-sale conversion price.

arrow