logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2016.09.20 2016고단198
특수상해
Text

1. The defendant is innocent. 2. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged [criminal record] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years in one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special injury, etc. at the resident support of the Daegu District Court on May 24, 2016.

[2] On December 8, 2014, at around 03:00, the Defendant, without any special reason, sustained the victim’s injuries, such as the part of the elbbow in the left part of the victim’s D (40 cm) with the kitchen kitchen (17cm in the blade, the total length of 24.5 cm), which is a dangerous object in the Gap’s own kitchen, at around 03:0, a stay at around 03:0, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, went on the part of the victim’s head, and continuously brought about the part of the elbbow in the treatment days.

2. While the Defendant was frequently fighting with the victim at the time, the Defendant asserts that the victim did not have any knife with a knife or with a knife with a knife.

In addition, it is difficult for the prosecution to believe that the following circumstances revealed by the records of this case include the victim's statement at the investigative agency, field photograph, and damaged photograph. In other words, it is difficult to believe that the victim's on-site photograph submitted by the victim was damaged at the time is due to this case because it is minor that it was damaged at the time, and it is difficult to believe that the damaged photograph submitted by the victim was damaged at the time. It is unclear whether the victim's on-site photograph was knife with knife, and there is no other photograph (in particular, after moving into knife with knife after moving into knife) or the treatment record of the victim was carried out. E was present at the investigative agency and did not regard that the Defendant and the victim were fnife two times other than the two times around November 2014 and January 2015.

Although E clearly stated, in the currency with the prosecution investigator, E was fice that knife knife from the damaged person at the time.

arrow