beta
Text
[Defendant B] The part of the judgment below as to Defendant B is reversed.
Defendant
B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
Reasons
1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;
A. A summary of the judgment of the court below 1) The Defendants were indicted for combination as follows: (a) Defendant A 2020 Ma28 (Defendant A) expressed a bath to the victim D (the age of 44) in his/her hand; (b) spits the face in his/her face while taking a bath to the victim E (the age of 67) and takes a bath to the victim E (the age of 67), spits it into his/her face; (c) spits it into his/her face; and (d) spits the victim F (the age of 61) into his/her face; and (e) spit the victim F (the age of 61); and (e) spaws the victim’s market price of 1 million won in his/her own market.
(B) Defendant A 2020 Gahap43 (Defendants) 2020 Gahap43 (Infabb) submitted a false complaint to the Busan Dongdong Police Station that “G, while taking daily drinking and drinking around the subway station, she was faced with the face of the victim B, such as sunshine, and Defendant B was able to take the face and shoulder of the victim A by drinking against the above behavior of the victim A (b) 2020 Gahap44 (Defendant B) c) 2020 Gahap44 (Defendant B) against the defendant, even though he did not assault the defendant by drinking, for the purpose of having him take criminal punishment, he submitted a false complaint to the Busan Dongdong Police Station that “G, while taking a bath against the defendant, she was punished by drinking because she could take the head of drinking.”
(B) The summary of the grounds of appeal 1) The above sentence imposed by the lower court on Defendant A (a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in prison labor and a person in six months are deemed to be guilty.
2) Defendant B’s erroneous determination of facts reveals that: (a) the Defendant did not assault the Victim A in relation to the instant case; and (b) in relation to the instant case, G was a true fact that G was voking and assaulted against the Defendant; (c) thus, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the charges against the Defendant.