logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.08.27 2015고단1600
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 29, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Ulsan District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. on February 8, 2011, a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Seoul Northern District Court, and a summary order of KRW 3.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on April 6, 201, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 8, 2015, at around 05:34, the Defendant driven a car in the column B in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.078% from the front direction of the city in Ulsan-si, Jung-gu to the half-gu distance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on the state of driving under the influence of alcohol and making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous for judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the same type of force and attachment of summary orders) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, and the selection of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Seoul High Court sentenced on September 6, 2012, one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of cutting-down and fire-prevention of the main building in the Seoul High Court, and on May 2, 2014, immediately after the execution of the sentence was completed by the Jinju Prison, the liability for the crime in the instant case is not less exceptionally applied, but the fact that it reflects the wrong, and that it is a mere driving under the influence of alcohol, etc. shall be determined as the same order.

arrow