logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.10 2015고단2764
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 28, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Daegu District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 5 million from the same court on April 20, 2012 to a fine for the same crime, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On August 28, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) was a person engaged in driving of B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-S

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle, such as putting the vehicle on the front-way traffic condition, accurately manipulating the steering system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level 0.144%, neglected to do so and went in the front and rear by negligence, received the D Ra car from the victim C(24 years old) who was under the right-hand turn signal at the left.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim, such as salt and tensions in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the injury to the victim E (the 29-year-old) of the damaged vehicle, such as salt pans, tensions, and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.144% at a section of about 300 meters from the front day of the office building sexual harassment in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do to the half-gu distance in the same Dong.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in C and E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on actual condition investigation, and

arrow