logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.01.20 2016구합50981
동아리개설불허처분 등 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a student attending the fifth grade of C Elementary School.

B. C Elementary School is implementing the student autonomous club system as a public elementary school located in Chuncheon City, and around March 2016, publicly announced the student autonomous club application application application.

C. Accordingly, around 2015, the Plaintiff et al. applied for the “D” club as a student autonomous club, which was a student autonomous club.

On April 28, 2016, the Defendant posted a public notice to the effect that he/she selects another Dong Ri other than the above Dong Ri as a student's autonomous Dong Ri through a meeting of the Dong Ri Selection Committee.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) e.

Accordingly, with the knowledge that the Plaintiff’s mother B was disqualified from the selection of the above Dong Ri, the Defendant requested the Defendant to reject the above Dong Ri, and the Defendant’s mother B, on June 23, 2016, deemed that it was difficult to deem that the Plaintiff’s mother B was a Dong Ri in which the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s mother B, “(1) ,” was able to do so by her own, and that religious activities in elementary schools may still affect her students in a value judgment. 3) In a religious neutral school’s standpoint, the Plaintiff rejected the selection of the above Dong Ri on the ground that it would not cause a significant obstacle to the operation of curriculum, rather than an individual’s subjective judgment, and this respondeded to the grounds for rejection of the above Dong Ri to the purport that it would be through a meeting for discussion and decision on the operation of curriculum in the school. [In the absence of any grounds for recognition, the purport of each of subparagraphs 1, 1, 1 through 5, 8, 9, and each of the arguments as a whole.

2. Judgment on the defendant's main defense

A. The defendant does not have the right to request the plaintiff to select the head of a school autonomously in consideration of the school's educational policy and budget situation, and there is no right to request the plaintiff to apply for the selection of the head of a school. Therefore, the defendant's establishment of a Dong Ri is denied.

arrow