1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 5, 2010, the Plaintiff obtained approval from the Defendant to establish a new B High School (hereinafter “instant school”) on the ground of the land of Busan-gun, Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and the same year.

5. The execution plan and construction approval of the school facilities project were obtained on November 22, 2012, and the school establishment authorization of the instant school was obtained on November 22, 2012.

B. On February 28, 2013, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to take the first corrective measure on the ground that “the Plaintiff had changed the initial establishment location while performing the new construction of the instant school and newly built a teacher,” and the same year.

3. 25. Requests for the second corrective measures, and the same year.

4. 30. A corrective order was issued for a violation of authorized matters for school establishment.

C. On August 20, 2013, the Defendant issued an administrative disposition to suspend the recruitment of students until the violation of the authorization to establish a school is resolved, and issued a corrective order on November 3, 2014, stating "the suspension of the operation of the curriculum in the first year and the guidance to enter a school for juveniles".

① Violation of the school establishment authorization, ① violation of the school establishment authorization, and violation of the school establishment authorization by constructing a new school by arbitrarily changing the school site of this case.

(2) When establishing a school, in spite of the change of the location of a teacher submitting false documents and the construction of a building, a false application for establishing a school is prepared and submitted to the defendant for authorization to establish the school in the area originally approved.

(3) Permission for activities as a development restriction zone is limited to a site in which a teacher newly built by the plaintiff in violation of a development restriction zone without permission is located.

④ The instant school building building failed to secure school facilities due to the lack of school facilities to obtain the approval for use of the instant school building building, thereby violating the matters to establish school.

⑤ Failure to comply with the Defendant’s corrective order

D. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant revoked the authorization to establish the instant school for the following reasons.