beta
Text
1. Ascertainment that the Plaintiff’s liability of KRW 1,995,708 against an e.g., , e., , or amplish loan company was discharged.
2.
Reasons
1. Determination on the claim against Defendant New Card Co., Ltd.
A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff’s husband B is the Defendant New Card Co., Ltd. (former El branch card; hereinafter “Defendant New Card”) on May 31, 2003.
(2) Upon receipt of a credit card from the Defendant’s credit card, the Plaintiff jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant’s credit card usage payment obligation against B and the Plaintiff. (2) The Defendant’s new credit card filed a lawsuit (U.S. District Court Decision 2006j13553) against the Plaintiff, and on November 30, 2006, “the Plaintiff shall jointly and severally with B pay 4,567,50,000 won and 2,70,000 won per annum from November 23, 2006 to the date of full payment,” and the payment order was served on the Plaintiff on December 11, 2006, and became final and conclusive as is December 27, 2006.
(3) On July 28, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) was declared bankrupt on May 30, 2012; and (b) was granted immunity on August 28, 2012; (c) on the list of creditors at the time of the decision to grant immunity, the Plaintiff entered the Suwon District Court Decision 201Hadha 6313, 201, 631, and 631, and was granted a decision to grant bankruptcy and immunity; and (d) on August 28, 2012, the list of creditors was omitted in the list of creditors (10,09,844 won); (c) the Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd. (the bond amount); (d) the Korea Asset Management Corporation (the principal, 2,018,70 won; the remaining interest 1,312,03 won); and (d) the Seoul Guarantee Fund (the remaining principal, 119,900 won, interest 20,760 won (the credit card amount).
5) On February 17, 2015, the Defendant New Card filed an application for a seizure and collection order against the Plaintiff’s deposit claims, etc. upon the instant payment order under Ansan Branch Branch of Suwon District Court Decision 2015TTT 2642, and received a seizure and collection order on February 24, 2015. 【Ground for Recognition” (Grounds for Recognition), the fact that there was no dispute, and the evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
written evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. The arguments of the parties and the summary of the 1st party's argument.