logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.11 2016가단5196601
양수금
Text

1. The lawsuit against the claims that were taken over from the new card, Samsung Bio-resources, and Hanhan Life Insurance among the lawsuit of this case

Reasons

1. In full view of the overall purport of pleadings as to the legitimacy of lawsuits against the claims that were acquired from new cards, Samsung Bio-resources, and Hansung Life Insurance, the Plaintiff’s new card was issued with an order for payment of credit card use charges under Changwon District Court Decision 2006Ra464, February 8, 2006, and the original payment order was issued on February 23, 2006. The new card was issued with an order for payment order under the above court Order under the name of debt obligations under the above finalized payment order under the name of 2011TTTT247, and the fact that Samsung Life Insurance received a collection order under the above established by the Seoul Central District Court Order under the name of 201Hun-Ba247, March 16, 201, and the purport of the entire argument is as follows. The new card was issued with an order for payment and collection order under the name of debt obligations under the above finalized payment order under the above established by the Seoul Central District Court Order under the name of 2014.215

2. Determination as to the remaining claims

A. The facts of the reasons for the claim (However, the creditor shall be deemed the plaintiff, the debtor shall be deemed the defendant, the Seoul Guarantee Insurance, and the Korean National Bank shall be limited to the claims acquired from the defendant) are either written in Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including the provisional number) or all pleadings.

arrow