logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.06.26 2019고단957
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a user who runs a construction business by ordinarily employing three workers under subparagraph c of the building B of Changwon-si, Changwon-si. The Defendant works as an electrical machine from October 10, 2017 to February 11, 2018 at a construction site located in D, E, and Mhap-gu F, etc.

Without agreement on the extension of the payment date between the parties concerned, the total of KRW 1750,000,000 of the wages, etc. of retired G was not paid within 14 days from the retirement

2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute cases where a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the clearly expressed intent of the victim. Since the victim G expressed its intent not to prosecute the Defendant after the instant public prosecution, the instant public prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow