logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2015.03.31 2014고단352
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

10,500,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around August 2012, the Defendant was the mother of D, the victim C’s dead relationship with the victim, and was asked by D that “the victim was exposed to the police while operating the sidewalk, and the case was sent to the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office, and changed in the course of investigation,” and was sentenced to obtain money from the victim under the pretext of solicitation to the investigation agency.

1. Around August 2012, the Defendant told the victim through D that “a case is a case in which a case can be identified and detained, so that the Defendant attempted to send KRW 500,000 won of meal expenses to the victim, who is going to know while carrying out a prosecutor and a meal.”

However, the defendant did not have any prosecutor, and there was no prosecutor's intention and ability to identify the case.

As a result, on August 30, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 500,000 from the victim to the account of his/her father E with the pretext of solicitation and solicitation, and received money and valuables on the pretext of soliciting the case handled by public officials at the same time.

2. On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The victim’s case may be detained” to the victim through a police officer D, stating that “the victim’s case may be detained, and the expenses incurred in solving the case shall be KRW 10 million.”

However, the defendant did not have any prosecutor, and there was no prosecutor's intention and ability to identify the case.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the E account of the suspect's father in the name of solicitation and control expenses, and received money and valuables from the victim on September 7, 2012 as the pretext of solicitation and control expenses, by deceiving the suspect's father, and at the same time soliciting the case handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement made to the witness D's satisfaction with this in this court;

1. Among the third trial records, the statement made by C in light of the statement statement written by C prepared by the prosecutor that conforms to the witness C in this Court.

arrow