1. The defendants are 25,953,694 won and 3,000 among them within the scope of property inherited from the network E to the plaintiff.

In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers), on May 26, 2005, in the case of loans, etc. filed by the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Deposit Insurance Corporation") with the bankrupt company in bankruptcy against the defendants on May 26, 2005, "the defendants filed against the plaintiff (the plaintiff) 254,829,988 won each within the scope of the property inherited from the network E and 28,000 won each among them, from April 10, 200, from 37,968,819 won each, from July 27, 2001 to 41,66,395 won each, and from March 8, 2002 to 23% each year, the plaintiff cannot be found to have been aware of the completion of the statute of limitations period." The plaintiff's claims against the defendants as to the above cancellation of the statute of limitations period.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to pay to the plaintiff 25,953,694 won each within the scope of the property inherited from the network E within the scope of the above confirmed claims, as requested by the plaintiff, and 3,000,000 won each among them, and to pay 3,750,000 won each as of July 27, 2001 with 23% interest per annum for 4,250,000 won from March 8, 2002 to the day of full payment.

As to this, the defendants have no benefit from the lawsuit of this case.

Although it is alleged that the Plaintiff’s claim is contrary to the good faith principle, the reason that there is no practical benefit is not a ground to reject the Plaintiff’s claim, and on the other hand, there is no ground to deem the claim

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.