1. The defendant,

(a) Plaintiff A: 2,748,535 won; 6,496,538 won; 2,748,535 won; D and E respectively; 1,832,357 won;

. As in paragraph 5, the Plaintiffs’ portion of inheritance was the share in the attached Form No. 6 of the inheritance shares by co-Succession to X’s property, such as paragraph 5.

E. Meanwhile, the land of this case is above A.

As stated in the foregoing paragraph, land category has changed and the defendant has been provided as a road for the general public's passage, and the defendant has occupied and managed it up to now. The rent for each period of land of this case, taking into account the actual use situation at the time of incorporation into a road, is as follows:

2. Fixed-term area of 2.3 : 0-7 2. 14 on July 14, 201 x 562,00 - 2712, 00 - 52, 424, 240 on July 14, 2012 to 3. 20-7 - 20-7 - 164 on July 14, 201 : 20-7 - 20-7 - 64 on July 16, 205 - 20-7 - 64 on July 14, 2013 : 20-7 - 65 - 669,000, 134, 00 - 25,582,680 on July 14, 2013 - 60-7 - 16, 2014

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the same amount as the above mentioned below, which is the unjust enrichment amounting to the fees calculated from July 14, 201, when five years have elapsed since the date of filing the lawsuit in this case, to the end of the defendant's possession of the land in this case or to the day of loss of the plaintiffs' ownership, to the co-owners of the land in this case, barring special circumstances.

Plaintiff

The rent derived from the period of inheritance (source) around December 2016, 31,23, 360 520, 366 A 11/125 2,748, 535, 792 B 26/125, 6,496, 538, 108, 333/375 2,748, 535, 535, 792D 22/375 1,8375 1,832, 357, 30, 528 E 22/3751,832, 35730, 528 F31/3752, 528, 581, 957 G 43,78/1, 375, 775, 1779, etc.